Logic Centres

Over the last 30 yrs, I have learnt/observed the following: at the current space and time women are far less intelligent than men, they may absorb more information and be able to regurgitated this, but their weakness in area's of logic and vulnerability to emotional decision making create a situation where men will always be the stronger sex, this is designed to balance out the male/female relationship; especially in regards to parenting and matters requiring softness. This is not to say that women cannot strengthen their logic centres and reduce emotional dependency however rather that they have an ingrained need to submit to these feelings which has been developed over hundreds of years. The distortion of confidence and esteem in males and the rot within a males character has turned this possible positive for women into a glaring negative in the 21st century, creating opportunity for exploitation and manipulation. There are of course exceptions, however this would be proven to show strong logic centres; affected by upbringing and cultural exposure. Moral of the story? "Make sure your daughters are strong, and truly understand respect"

Signs Summary

I am going to have some amusement with this :P

Why? Simply because I can. Feel free to dispute this.

What have I learnt/observed in life, from those about me and online? In no Particular order

Pisces:

Pisces Women are fairly insecure, they butterfly about and are difficult to corner.

Quite Loyal, and very sensory, however the closer they get to someone, the less they can feel or sense.

Excellent as an advisor or bestfriend. Dislike criticism (Pisces are well aware of their issues and don't appreciate them being highlighted)

Leo:

Leo Women are very very strong, they like to push back and overpower. They can be considered bitchy and generally show contempt for weaker women.

Leo Women are attracted to dominant males, and dislike insecurity and low-self esteem.

Quite sexual, and have a high demand for respect given, although they may not give it back.

Leo Women generally observe before committing to a situation.

Cancer:

Cancer Women are very physically insecure, they are quite loyal however-even to the point of their own unhappiness.

A Cancer Woman will consider most things sexually in order to satisfy their partner and maintain his attentions.

Cancer Women are terrible friends when in a relationship, they usually distance themselves from most males.

Scorpio:

Scorpio Women are the curious type, they like to flaunt with danger. Scorpio's are highly sexual and quite loyal.

However they maintain a level of vindictiveness and have no qualms about creating issues if hurt by a partner.

Scorpio's are highly loyal to family, and have a high sense in regards to Respect shown towards them.

Often insecure and willing to do numerous silly things in order to secure their friendships.

Aries:

Aries Women are quite headstrong, they will often rush into a situation believing they maintain enough power to over-come any obstacles.

An Aries Woman generally fails to consider those around her, and leads them astray without thinking about that parties abiliy to survive any fallout.

Aries are generally quite willing to attempt drugs, drinking games, etc.

Saggitarius:

A Saggitarius Woman is the Princess of the bunch. They are very physically aware and wish to stand out. They are often those who will consider implants, tattoo's, hair dye in order to differentiate themselves. A Saggitarius Woman enjoys the limelight, cocktail parties, fine dining and expensive ideas. They are very well rounded as a gold-digger. Saggitarius often dislike competition and enjoy being the Queen amongst other Women, or the only Female present.

Saggitarius often consider their male partners as an extension of themselves, they want a partner to meet a certain physical standard and are quite rude to those that do not. They often will sacrifice intelligence for these needs.

Capricorn:

A Capricorn Woman has a need to be social, they cannot hide from the limelight for long periods before they start to feel anxious. Very arty and often relatively standoffish. A Capricorn Woman often requires someone to push them quite hard in order to develop their own energy to succeed in their dreams.

Very fashion conscious. Capricorn Women are quite flirty and are content in allowing partners to maintain female friendships as a justification for their own.

Capricorns enjoy alcohol and are quite content to flutter around an empty dancefloor with little care.

Gemini:

A Gemini Woman is a headache. Gemini's will flirt, but then throw the responsibility for the discussion topic back in your face. They are not trustworthy over the longterm and generally push people away.

Taurus:

A Taurus Woman loves food. They love to cook and enjoy dinners. Quite Loyal and very stubborn. A Taurus requires negotiation for things to be accomplished that they dislike undertaking.

Virgo:

A Virgo girl is quite a good girlfriend. Loyal and honest, however quite insecure. A Virgo is somewhat naive and easily led astray, however there is no malicious reasoning behind this occurence.

As I said, feel free to dispute this. It is what I noticed, not what I read and evolves as I learn more.

Lastly, whether women like it or not; they are all attracted to dominant, assertive, confident males. However it must be noted that the difference between dominant and possessive/controlling is a large divide. A Dominant/Assertive Male is more likely to be influential in major events; discussion around childrens education, religion, asset purchases and feel they do not need to decide mundane arguements. A Controlling/Possessive Male feels the need to control EVERYTHING around them, but has little control of their own things.

The Ladder Theory: Flawed and Adopted by the Ignorant

The Ladder Theory is a Relationship/Friendship Theory that places people in a particular place on a ladder as we see them, supposably we have 2; those as friends and those as possibilities. The Theory is basically that these people cannot jump Ladder to Ladder nor move any relative distance. The basic premise is flawed. The reason for this is primarily that the Theory requires life to be Static or Stagnant and does not acknowledge that we are infact Dynamic, or in Flux, there is no room for improvement nor failure.

I.e the Fat kid cannot become the muscular attractive kid if he has already been placed on the ladder on 1 spot

Lessons Learnt

Anyone who has read anything I wrote knows that I rarely blog what is on my mind, but generally digest and then dissect what I see around me. I am fairly disappointed with the state of friendship in today's society, there seems to be an increasing level of "territorialism" being applied in this area of life. For what point? For what gain? Absolutely nothing. I just lost 2 girls I consider worthwhile friends in the longterm, simply because both parties are to immature to see why there is value or reasons in knowing both. One girl trains to the utmost and is exceedingly disciplined, my masculine side respects and enjoys that, the other is more relaxed and arty. Both connections appeal to my psyche. Yet the insecurities that are in their own minds twist the reality and reason behind the wishes to connection. In an ideal World all parties could have coffee, 1 to 1, 1 to 2, it would not matter. It makes me pained to have this experience over and over...

How to get a Nice Ass Ver2

Without an Ass many Women and even Men lack shape (although I rarely have no interest in the Men situation, but it is still accurate). They lack the shape in Dresses, Fitted Pants, Bikini's, Hot Pants, etc. Many Women also are under a number of misconceptions regarding how to get a nice ass. This is evident in Training Programmes found in Gyms and the General Populations POV.

I have written the below; with some help by a number of my female friends; to help rectify this issue. They have been willing to provide examples of what a Good Ass looks like and how this can be achieved. Please note that this is not linked to any ethnic group or racial profile but certain populations have an advantage. I.e Latin or African American & African




Misconception 1: Squats make an Ass
A good ass is a consequence of Squats. Incorrect; Squats are an exercise that improve the amount of Muscle located around the Thighs and Hamstrings. Squats are generally undertaken by Athletes that require size and power. i.e Rugby, American Football. A programme with Squats will NOT give you a nice Ass, it will in fact give you a large amount of Muscle that will be without Shape and Droop. Squats ARE required to give the muscle size NEEDED to make a Nice Ass, however as the preferred size becomes apparent, the amount of Squats undertaken and weight lifted should be REDUCED. This requirement is due to the nature of constant stimulation of the lower body in day to day activity.

Misconception 2: Only African and Latin Women can have a bouncy round ass.
A nice Ass is a combination of 2 things; Appropriate Muscle Mass and Appropriate Fat Distribution. A person's genetic may play a part in getting to the result alot quicker, however it is nonsense to assume that being Asian and Western that a nice ass is beyond your reach. A proper training programme is required to reach this goal. Even if you have no Ass at all, this can be changed. It may take a period of time and cause a great deal of Muscle Soreness, but it will occur. (The above picts are actually Asian and Western)

Ass Test:
Firstly you need to give yourself the Ass Test. Now if you DONT have an Ass, you fail this test. Its for those who need tone and improve. Developing an Ass is a different approach.

To do this test, you need to understand the following.
A Nice ASS Bounces, it does NOT Jiggle like Jelly, or Wobble like Homer Simpsons belly.
It has a smooth bounce, when dancing or being spanked.

1. So to do this test you need to be Naked or in a Thong. You ass needs NO support.
2. Stand up straight, in front of a mirror or turn and look down and ur hip. (Twist from the waist)
3. Give your ass a nice sharp spank, and watch it moves. If it jiggles randomly in multiple directions and looks like someone threw a rock in a puddle, it definitely needs work. If it bounces smoothly, the same a when you smack muscle, then your on the right track.

Exercises to Improve your Ass. (Use Google Images or something)
1. Squats are a Joke. If you have an ASS, the doing SQUATS will make your ASS bigger. If you DONT have n ASS then DO SQUATS until it is present and then STOP. Unless you want to be "Like Woah"
2. Do deep Bulgarian Split Squats. Dumbbell or Barbell (3-4 Sets, 12-15 Reps per Leg, 60-90seconds Rest)
3. Do pelvic thrusts. (Similar to the pilates exercise, except the feet extended are further from the body. (Do 20-30 for 2-3seconds eac)
4. Do alot of toe touches to stretch the hamstring, a nice ass and legs have nice long muscles, they show firmness and leanness.
5. Throw in some deep, light weight, high rep Legpress. (20reps, 3sets)

Cardio for a Nice Ass:
When developing an Ass
1. Stick to a decent time Period on the Stepper. approximately 20mins per Session. Slow Speed
2. Do approximately 15mins Per Session on the Treadmill

When you have an Ass.
1. Do approximately 10mins Per Session on the Stepper
2. Do approximately 30mins Per Session on the Treadmill

Enjoy your bikini's
-Daryl

Why do Relationships lose their vigor over the longterm.

The other day I was asked the question. "Do Men lose interest in their wives/gf's over-time?". The simple answer is generally Yes. The follow-up question is Why?

The 20th and 21st Century are periods of time that brought about a great deal of changes in the options for Women in the West. Prior to these changes they were mostly seen as silent partners in a relationship. These changes allowed for women to gain more independence and expand their interests. The problem is when Women generally enter a relationship they cut off numerous interests that they maintain and also a number of friends. In essence they mirror their male partners; friends, social agenda's, interests; forsaking their own. Prior to the 20th Century, this was considered the normal approach and would have been applauded by Mothers and Grand Mothers. However, this isolation and lack of independent identity creates internal conflict and frustration. In order to maintain a relationship headed in the same direction it is important to maintain 3 sets of interests and social connections; Hers, Theirs and His. This thought pattern is something quite difficult to accept and change. Since birth, and even during schooling Men and Women are often segregated in activities. An analysis of the Divorce Rate in young people will show this trend. The difficulty of this situation is it is quite difficult to develop the Hers and His identity while in an existing relationship, unless the activity is particularly feminine and/or masculine and the other party is secure enough to allow these developments.

The best approach is to consider what sort of interests you have, and wish to maintain. For example; I personally will NOT consider a relationship with a girl who does not work out. Not to the extend to which I mayself may train, but enough to know that she understands Goals, Discipline, Dieting, Muscle Soreness, etc. This is an important basis in a structure. The alternative point may be that a Woman may insist that her Man knows how to dance a structured dance. I.e Salsa, Rumba, Ball Room.

Sadly, given the age in which most people undertake their first serious relationship a large percentage of people, especially the women, lack the opportunity to develop their own identities. This failure to be actually unique and show unique combinations leads to insecurity due to a issue with being seperated from the crowd. This can be shown later in the habits of later adolesence and early adult life, people seek to differentiate themselves greatly; i.e tattoos, piercings, etc.

The root cause of this problem actually lays with the ignorance of the Government and Education system around us.

TBC

Economic Recovery and Employment Curtailed by Corporations and Naive Governments

Why is the Global Economy close to a second recession and why has the US Economy failed to recover? Simple. Democracy and Corporate Monopolies.

In order to understand how this might be possible, it would be good to understand how Corporations work in regards to Infrastructure development projects.

Example: A Government body decides that they need build a new airport. They work out the cost of investment and the number of jobs that will be created through the process. I.e 5000 Construction Staff. There are 10000 unemployed, but 5000 currently working in this same industry. So they estimate that half their unemployment  numbers will be reduced by 50%, making it 10000 employed and 5000 unemployed.
Makes sense so far? sounds good?

Ok, the next step is to release the project to a Tender Bid. This is when they invite all the EPCM's to bid on the costs. The problem is, alot of these EPCM's have an existing workforce and engineering team and add the acquired work onto the end of their contract amounts. They may only recruit another 1000 staff because they use their existing teams.

Does this make sense?