Logic Centres

Over the last 30 yrs, I have learnt/observed the following: at the current space and time women are far less intelligent than men, they may absorb more information and be able to regurgitated this, but their weakness in area's of logic and vulnerability to emotional decision making create a situation where men will always be the stronger sex, this is designed to balance out the male/female relationship; especially in regards to parenting and matters requiring softness. This is not to say that women cannot strengthen their logic centres and reduce emotional dependency however rather that they have an ingrained need to submit to these feelings which has been developed over hundreds of years. The distortion of confidence and esteem in males and the rot within a males character has turned this possible positive for women into a glaring negative in the 21st century, creating opportunity for exploitation and manipulation. There are of course exceptions, however this would be proven to show strong logic centres; affected by upbringing and cultural exposure. Moral of the story? "Make sure your daughters are strong, and truly understand respect"

Signs Summary

I am going to have some amusement with this :P

Why? Simply because I can. Feel free to dispute this.

What have I learnt/observed in life, from those about me and online? In no Particular order

Pisces:

Pisces Women are fairly insecure, they butterfly about and are difficult to corner.

Quite Loyal, and very sensory, however the closer they get to someone, the less they can feel or sense.

Excellent as an advisor or bestfriend. Dislike criticism (Pisces are well aware of their issues and don't appreciate them being highlighted)

Leo:

Leo Women are very very strong, they like to push back and overpower. They can be considered bitchy and generally show contempt for weaker women.

Leo Women are attracted to dominant males, and dislike insecurity and low-self esteem.

Quite sexual, and have a high demand for respect given, although they may not give it back.

Leo Women generally observe before committing to a situation.

Cancer:

Cancer Women are very physically insecure, they are quite loyal however-even to the point of their own unhappiness.

A Cancer Woman will consider most things sexually in order to satisfy their partner and maintain his attentions.

Cancer Women are terrible friends when in a relationship, they usually distance themselves from most males.

Scorpio:

Scorpio Women are the curious type, they like to flaunt with danger. Scorpio's are highly sexual and quite loyal.

However they maintain a level of vindictiveness and have no qualms about creating issues if hurt by a partner.

Scorpio's are highly loyal to family, and have a high sense in regards to Respect shown towards them.

Often insecure and willing to do numerous silly things in order to secure their friendships.

Aries:

Aries Women are quite headstrong, they will often rush into a situation believing they maintain enough power to over-come any obstacles.

An Aries Woman generally fails to consider those around her, and leads them astray without thinking about that parties abiliy to survive any fallout.

Aries are generally quite willing to attempt drugs, drinking games, etc.

Saggitarius:

A Saggitarius Woman is the Princess of the bunch. They are very physically aware and wish to stand out. They are often those who will consider implants, tattoo's, hair dye in order to differentiate themselves. A Saggitarius Woman enjoys the limelight, cocktail parties, fine dining and expensive ideas. They are very well rounded as a gold-digger. Saggitarius often dislike competition and enjoy being the Queen amongst other Women, or the only Female present.

Saggitarius often consider their male partners as an extension of themselves, they want a partner to meet a certain physical standard and are quite rude to those that do not. They often will sacrifice intelligence for these needs.

Capricorn:

A Capricorn Woman has a need to be social, they cannot hide from the limelight for long periods before they start to feel anxious. Very arty and often relatively standoffish. A Capricorn Woman often requires someone to push them quite hard in order to develop their own energy to succeed in their dreams.

Very fashion conscious. Capricorn Women are quite flirty and are content in allowing partners to maintain female friendships as a justification for their own.

Capricorns enjoy alcohol and are quite content to flutter around an empty dancefloor with little care.

Gemini:

A Gemini Woman is a headache. Gemini's will flirt, but then throw the responsibility for the discussion topic back in your face. They are not trustworthy over the longterm and generally push people away.

Taurus:

A Taurus Woman loves food. They love to cook and enjoy dinners. Quite Loyal and very stubborn. A Taurus requires negotiation for things to be accomplished that they dislike undertaking.

Virgo:

A Virgo girl is quite a good girlfriend. Loyal and honest, however quite insecure. A Virgo is somewhat naive and easily led astray, however there is no malicious reasoning behind this occurence.

As I said, feel free to dispute this. It is what I noticed, not what I read and evolves as I learn more.

Lastly, whether women like it or not; they are all attracted to dominant, assertive, confident males. However it must be noted that the difference between dominant and possessive/controlling is a large divide. A Dominant/Assertive Male is more likely to be influential in major events; discussion around childrens education, religion, asset purchases and feel they do not need to decide mundane arguements. A Controlling/Possessive Male feels the need to control EVERYTHING around them, but has little control of their own things.

The Ladder Theory: Flawed and Adopted by the Ignorant

The Ladder Theory is a Relationship/Friendship Theory that places people in a particular place on a ladder as we see them, supposably we have 2; those as friends and those as possibilities. The Theory is basically that these people cannot jump Ladder to Ladder nor move any relative distance. The basic premise is flawed. The reason for this is primarily that the Theory requires life to be Static or Stagnant and does not acknowledge that we are infact Dynamic, or in Flux, there is no room for improvement nor failure.

I.e the Fat kid cannot become the muscular attractive kid if he has already been placed on the ladder on 1 spot